Wednesday, November 7, 2012

California Rejects Labeling Of Genetically Modified Foods Supporters Vow To Fight On

What a big difference $46 million in Tv ad spending can make.

At least that was the consensus in the wee hours of the morning at the Yes on Proposition 37 party, held at a functionality art room in San Francisco's Mission District, even just before the last votes were tallied.

Supporters of genetically modified food labeling rally last month at Los Angeles City Hall.

Supporters of genetically modified foods labeling rally final month at Los Angeles City Hall.

i
Supporters of genetically modified food labeling rally last month at Los Angeles City Hall.

Supporters of genetically modified food labeling rally last month at Los Angeles City Hall.

Outspent a lot of occasions in excess of, "we could not get up on the air," organizer Stacy Malkan informed The Salt when it appeared the measure was going down. "You need to have a selected saturation to have an impact."

All eyes in the food globe have been on California's hotly contested genetically modified (GMO) food labeling proposal, which was defeated this morning by a substantial margin 53 % of the state's voters opposed and 47 % in favor.

It would have expected that most meals containing genetically modified components carry a " Created with GMO" label on the box. Given the prevalence of genetically designed corn and soy in processed foods, these labels would have been virtually ubiquitous in the middle aisles of the grocery retailer. And, provided the size of California's market, and manufacturers' opposition to distribute two versions of packaging, the California law could have morphed into de facto national policy as very well.

The news was properly - received in the No camp, which had argued that the proposal would be expensive and confusing. "We said from the starting that men and women really should consider a close search at 37, that it really is not as straightforward as it would seem from the surface," Kathy Fairbanks with the No on 37 campaign, which didn't hold a public celebration, informed us last night when it appeared the measure would be defeated. "The a lot more voters discovered about 37, the more they recognized they didn't like it."

But supporters were unbowed. In truth, they say, even however Proposition 37 lost, a grass-roots motion came with each other with a distinct purpose ( in contrast to the Occupy movement, Grist snarks) to focus on what is on our plates. " Never mourn, organize!" is a well-known Twitter update from supporters these days.

"Californians and all Americans deserve the correct to know what is in their meals," said Jean Halloran, director of meals policy initiatives for Shoppers Union, in a statement released this morning. " Unfortunately, Proposition 37 was defeated by a wildly deceptive smear campaign financed by Monsanto, DuPont and other marketplace opponents of the public's proper to know," she stated.

So about that campaign. The No on 37 camp, which opposed GMO labeling, raised $45.9 million, thanks in large element to biotech giant Monsanto, along with a acquainted roster of huge -supermarket brand names : Kraft, Heinz, Sara Lee, Pepsico, etc. The primary message? Your groceries will cost much more.

Meanwhile, Yes on 37 brought in $9. four million from a far crunchier lineup, which include small -print soap makers Dr. Bronner's, Entire Meals and the Illinois- based nutritional supplement maker Joseph Mercola. Oh, and Hollywood: Gwyneth Paltrow single-handedly raised $80,000 for the Yes camp after endorsing the campaign on her Facebook page. Danny DeVito and Dave Matthews pitched in for a Tv ad. And, stated Malkan, "Sting's people have been calling us final night, asking what they could do to enable."

But it was as well small, too late, she added. Regardless of an initially hefty lead by the pro-labeling folks, Proposition 37 help took a dive soon after the No on 37 adverts hit the airwaves. Inside two weeks, assistance for 37 dropped 9 percentage factors, according to a single poll from Pepperdine University and the California Enterprise Roundtable.

The No camp also received a enhance from a series of substantial -profile endorsements, which includes one from the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the country's largest science organization.

Proposition 37 and other labeling propositions "are not driven by evidence that GM meals are essentially hazardous," wrote the AAAS board of directors. " Certainly, the science is fairly distinct : Crop improvement by the contemporary molecular methods of biotechnology is safe and sound."

As we reported earlier this summer, some authorized experts raised issues about how the proposal was written and advised that it would add confusion not clarity to foods labels. And, a number of of the state's massive newspapers the Los Angeles Occasions, San Francisco Chronicle and San Jose Mercury News all came out towards the labeling proposal for similar motives.

Other states have proposed comparable labeling measures.


Topic Galleries -- chicagotribune.com - Chicago Tribune: Chicago ... Topic galleries provide easy access to stories and photos about people, places, organizations, events and subjects of interest to you. They bring together rich ... Industrial Farming & related Make up your own Mind The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must. Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011 Genetically modified food controversies - Wikipedia, the free ... The genetically modified foods controversy is a dispute over the relative advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified food, genetically modified crops used ... Will Genetically Engineered Foods Feed the World? Paul Goettlich ... Will Genetically Engineered Foods Feed the World? Paul Goettlich / Mindfully.org . Rev. 3jun2006 [More by Paul Goettlich] Introduction. First, please note that this ... GM Food Make up your own Mind Posts about GM Food written by my logic of truth ... The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. Democracy Now! Democracy Now! Headlines for April 24, 2012 Tension appears to be rapidly escalating between Sudan and South Sudan in a conflict over oil profits and territorial disputes. Earlier today, South Sudans ... Government Relations NACS Online News & Media Center News Government Relations News. Election Has Small Businesses Looking for Relief Both President Obama and presidential candidate Mitt Romney have pointed out how their ... ProbateSharks.com Featured Content ProbateSharks.com. Our mission is to expose and remedy corruption in the Probate Court of Cook County, Illinois. We assist, educate and enlighten ... THE BAN OF HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP IN THE U.S Facebook THE BAN OF HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP IN THE U.S. 209,200 likes 692 talking about this. U.S. News National News - Latest Headlines, Videos, Photos - ABC ... ABC News reports on United States politics, crime, education, legal stories, celebrities, weather, the economy and more

No comments:

Post a Comment